Get Adobe Flash player

Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws

Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws


Free Online Articles Directory





Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
AB Answers

Publish Article

0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Hello Guest
Login


Login via


Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out

Email

Password


Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > Law > National, State, Local > Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws

Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws

Edit Article |

Posted: Jul 19, 2010
|

Share

]]>

Syndicate this Article

Copy to clipboard

Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws

By: Atchuthan Sriskandarajah

About the Author

The SRIS Law Group Grandparents Rights Lawyers assist grandparents with custody and visitation rights so that they may visit or obtain custody of their grandchildren in Virginia, Maryland & Massachusetts.

(ArticlesBase SC #2857818)

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/Grandparents Rights Virginia Custody Visitation Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws

MARK MERRITT, SR. AND JAYNE MERRITT v. SANDRA-JOY GRAY

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Following the death of the child’s biological mother, father did not allow grandmother to visit with the child for some eleven months. In August 1994, grandmother filed a petition seeking visitation with her grandson. In January 1995, around the time father relocated with his family to Nashville, Tennessee, the parties entered into an Agreed Order in the juvenile and domestic relations district court incorporating their agreement that visitation of the child with grandmother was in the child’s best interests. The court order fixed specific dates of visitation on two designated weekends. In April 2001, parents sent a letter to grandmother stating that they wanted more authority over visitation and desired to reduce the child’s visits with her. In May 2001, father filed a petition to modify the 1995 consent order.  On February 20, 2002, the juvenile and domestic relations district court denied father’s petition, finding that the reasons given by father did not constitute a “material” change in circumstances.  Father appealed the denial of his petition to modify the 1995 order to the circuit court.

Whether the trial court erred in finding that the changes in circumstances were not sufficient to warrant modification of the 1995 Agreed Order?

Whether the trial court erred in not applying an “actual harm” analysis in determining whether continued visitation with grandmother by child was in his best interest?

Whether the trial court erred in ruling that the parent had permanently “waived their constitutional rights” as a result of entering into the 1995 consent order?

Whether the trial court erred in finding that the changes in circumstances were not sufficient to warrant modification of the 1995 Agreed Order?

The trial court found that the time the child spent visiting with grandmother was not of a degree to conflict with his increased activities. It noted that grandmother accommodated the child’s increased activities when those scheduled activities occurred when the child visited her, noting specifically that she took the child to his scheduled football practices, and accommodated his scouting trips when they occurred during her visitation periods. The trial court also found that the family’s return to Northern Virginia where grandmother resided did not make visitation more difficult. The court held that the changes were not “material changes in circumstances, which would warrant modification of the existing Court order.” We conclude that the trial court did not err in finding that the changes in circumstances were not sufficient to warrant modification of the 1995 Agreed Order governing visitation and that there is credible evidence in the record to support its decision.

Whether the trial court erred in not applying an “actual harm” analysis in determining whether continued visitation with grandmother by child was in his best interest?

The court held that since the trial court found that no material changes in circumstances had occurred to warrant modifying the consent order, including that continuing visitation was in the best interests of the child, it was not necessary for it to apply the “actual harm” test in determining whether to modify the 1995 Agreed Order.

Whether the trial court erred in ruling that the parent had permanently “waived their constitutional rights” as a result of entering into the 1995 consent order?

The court held that the parents, unquestionably fit parents, entered into the Agreed Order in March of 1995 that not only permitted visitation but also announced their agreement that such visitation was in the best interests of their child. Here, the parents never voiced opposition to visitation occurring.  We find no indication in the record that the trial court ruled that parents’ consent to the entry of the 1995 Agreed Order, granting to grandmother limited visitation with the child, divested them permanently of their constitutionally protected interests in the care and control of their child.  There is no showing in the record before us that the trial court failed to “accord at least some special weight” to the parents’ determination of visitation periods when those decisions were presented to it. As we noted above, parents voluntarily “waived” their parental rights to a limited degree by asking the court to assist in the establishment of times of visitation when the parties were unable to agree. As the trial court noted in announcing its decision from the bench, the parents could not reduce the consent order to “a sham” by de facto refusing to agree to any times for visitation.  The trial court did not err in concluding that the parents waived their constitutional rights to a limited degree when they entered into a consent order agreeing that their child’s visitation with his grandmother was in his best interests.

We affirmed the Judgment of trial court.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Retrieved from “http://www.articlesbase.com/national-state-local-articles/grandparents-rights-virginia-custody-visitation-maryland-massachusetts-lawyers-laws-2857818.html

(ArticlesBase SC #2857818)

Atchuthan Sriskandarajah -
About the Author:

The SRIS Law Group Grandparents Rights Lawyers assist grandparents with custody and visitation rights so that they may visit or obtain custody of their grandchildren in Virginia, Maryland & Massachusetts.

]]>

Rate this Article

1
2
3
4
5

vote(s)
0 vote(s)

Feedback
RSS
Print
Email
Re-Publish

Source:  http://www.articlesbase.com/national-state-local-articles/grandparents-rights-virginia-custody-visitation-maryland-massachusetts-lawyers-laws-2857818.html

Article Tags:
grandparents rights virginia custody visitation maryland massachusetts lawyers laws

Related Videos

Latest National, State, Local Articles
More from Atchuthan Sriskandarajah


Guide to Toddler Well Child Visits

Dr. Barry Hainer discusses what a parent and a child can expect during a well-child visit.
(03:36)


What to Expect from A Child’s Visit to the Doctor

Join a discussion about growth and development by Dr. Hands, who presents all that any parent would like to know about any health concern during the first few years of child’s life. This video explains what to expect from a visit to the doctor. (04:00)


Routine Doctors Visits for Children

Dr. Barry Hainer discusses how often a child should see a doctor and describes what preventive health measures are taken at several of these visits.

(02:25)


How to Get a Child to Cooperate in a Physical Exam

Join a discussion about growth and development by Dr. Hands, who presents all that any parent would like to know about any health concern during the first few years of child’s life. This video shows you tricks to get a child to cooperate in a physical exa (06:47)


Your Child’s First Visit to the Dentist

Alex Hecht DDS, NYU Dental School, tells you when you should bring your child for their first visit to the Dentist. (01:08)

Effective Review of Property Laws

Property law falls into the common law legal system and concerns all aspects of ownership of ‘real’ property (land ownership as opposed to ownership of movable possessions) and personal property (movable possessions).

By:
tim jhonsonl

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 07, 2010

BUSINESS LITIGATION ATTORNEY

A business attorney may be called upon to draft business contracts, rental contracts, or employee contracts for businesses. In the event of the sale or merging of any company, the attorney will be on hand to draft documents required to acknowledge the sale and complete the transfer of assets in an orderly fashion.

By:
Emiley Davidl

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 07, 2010

Points When You Will Need a Boston Car Accident Lawyer — Things to Remember!

Having a car accident can really cause a lot of trouble. One thing is that you can experience physical trauma and mental trauma depending on the accident. This also means that you have to be ready with your pocket since it is already expected that it can also cause financial burden to you. But, aside from those problems stated, legal actions should always be done, most especially in huge accidents that is why you must have your own Boston car accident lawyer.

By:
Cheryll

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 06, 2010

Did your boss fail to pay you for your overtime?

Michael J. Redenburg, Esq. PC is a leading Firm representing hard working individuals in overtime litigation claims. The Firm is bringing claims in the Southern and Eastern District Federal Courts of New York on behalf of employees to recover unpaid overtime wages owed to hardworking current and former employees.

By:
Michael J. Redenburg, Esq.l

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 05, 2010

More Do’s and Don’ts in Child Custody Disputes

In my previous article on child custody do’s and don’ts, I discussed the importance of carefully introducing significant others to your child, warned against parental alienation, and encouraged communication and information sharing. In this article, I’ll review more do’s and don’ts important in child custody disputes.

By:
Scott David Stewartl

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 05, 2010

2010 State Income Tax Rates – Lower Your Tax Burden

With taxes on the rise, it’s important to understand how you can lower your state taxes or even eliminate them completely. This article will show you where you will pay the highest, the lowest, and even zero state income taxes.

By:
John Hammell

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 05, 2010

Reflections on Recent Elections

CarrollLawFirm.com is a Law Firm provides Attorneys, Lawyers, Family Law, Wills, Business Law, Estate Planning, Personal Injury, Trademarks, Bankruptcy services in Arizona!

By:
CarollLawFirml

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 05, 2010

Austin Texas Secretary of State Apostille Services – Don’t Be Scammed!

Don’t be scammed by all the apostille service companies nationwide that don’t explain to you in detail the in’s and out’s of how to apostille a document in Texas and at a fair price.

By:
Ben Jordanl

Law>
National, State, Locall
Nov 04, 2010

Virginia Divorce Collaborative Law & Mediation – Is it better than litigation

Collaborative divorce and mediation in Virginia preserves the parties’ self determination. When engaging in a collaborative divorce or mediation, the parties retain control. The parties determine how quickly they will move.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl
Lawl
Nov 07, 2010

Virginia Reckless Driving Ticket Statute & Punishment For Class 1 Misdemeanor in VA

Virginia reckless driving ticket is a very serious criminal offense. Know the law and make sure you get help before you go to court.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Criminall
Nov 03, 2010

Virginia Underage Drinking Laws, DUI and BAC Know the Law Before You Drink and Drive

Virginia Underage Drinking Laws are now tougher than ever. Don’t risk driving under the influence.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Criminall
Nov 01, 2010

Virginia Loudoun County Demurrer Property Settlement Agreement Divorce Extrinsic Fraud Lawyers Attorney

The plaintiff former wife Mrs. Moller filed suit against former husband that the property settlement agreement that both had signed, and which was incorporated in their final divorce decree entered by this Court on May 7, 1984, be set aside on the grounds of fraud and duress perpetrated by the former husband inducing her to sign the agreement.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Health and Safetyl
Oct 15, 2010

Virginia Chesterfield County Injunction Divorce Desertion Cruelty Eviction Ex Parte Hearing Lawyers Attorney

The appellant-wife filed a bill of complaint and petition for injunction against appellee-husband alleging that he had physically abused her causing reasonable apprehension of bodily injury. She sought inter alia, a divorce on the ground of cruelty and constructive desertion and spousal support and requested that the husband be enjoined from “going on the premises” of the marital abode.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Health and Safetyl
Oct 15, 2010

Virginia Norfolk City Divorce Decree Alimony Public Policy Property Rights Lawyers Attorney

The appellant married James M. McFarland and got separated from him in Virginia. The husband’s suit for divorce in Virginia was dismissed awarding the wife custody of the four children and alimony. Then the husband obtained a divorce decree from North Carolina which was inoperative and invalid in Virginia.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Health and Safetyl
Oct 15, 2010

Virginia Reckless Driving Habitual Offender License Operator

Petitioner challenged the correctness of the Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) determination that she was a habitual offender, and revocation of her operator’s license.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Criminall
Oct 15, 2010

Virginia Suffolk City Isle of Wight County Misdemeanor Crime Driving While Intoxicated Lawyers Attorneys

On June 7, 1985, at approximately 10:26 p.m., Suffolk Chief of Police observed appellant driving a car and swerving all over the road. The Police followed him for five or six miles into Isle of Wight County. He never indicated to appellant that he was a police officer in pursuit of him or that he intended to stop or arrest him. He called another Officer Bradshaw, and he stopped appellant after locating him approximately two miles into Isle of Wight County.

By:
Atchuthan Sriskandarajahl

Law>
Health and Safetyl
Oct 15, 2010

Submit

Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy

Sign Up Today

Author Navigation

My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder

My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box


Atchuthan Sriskandarajah has 492 articles online

Contact Author

Subscribe to RSS

Print article

Send to friend

Re-Publish article

Articles Categories
All Categories

Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Judaism
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing

Law

Bankruptcy
Copyright
Criminal
Cyber Law
Health and Safety
Immigration
Intellectual Property
Internet Law
National, State, Local
Patents
Personal Injury
Regulatory Compliance
Trademarks

]]>

Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog

Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map

Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us

Business Info
Advertising

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright (c) 2005-2010 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.

Originally published here.


The SRIS Law Group Grandparents Rights Lawyers assist grandparents with custody and visitation rights so that they may visit or obtain custody of their grandchildren in Virginia, Maryland & Massachusetts.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.